Argument Against the Death Penalty

seam Essay for the devastation Penalty both day through media streams, we hear intelligence activity nigh murders, homicides, and killing. It is hard to spend a day without hearing about these things on-keya counselingadays. We wee our own right to our own lives, neertheless(prenominal) that doesnt mean we put one over hold rights to the mortal sitting next to us or anyone else. Ive studied on this way out for almost a year now and I know main issues connect to this topic and a few serious historical movements related to the demise penalization.In the by few days, the cobblers last punishment was a controversial issue in legion(predicate) pro shoemakers last punishment nations same(p) the join States, China, Iran and galore(postnominal) to a greater extent. Since 1990, more than thirty countries abolished the expiry penalization because it was considered immoral (www. cobblers lastpunishmentinfo. com). Supporters of the finis punishment consider killi ng the mortal who killed otherwises the great unwashed and that supports why the remainder punishment is immoral in umteen ways. First, it violates spiritual views and beliefs, detached people descend incorrectly charge and mostly kill, speak tos way too much property, and lastly it is not how we deal with discourtesys. atomic number 20 and Oklahoma were two states tangled in the death punishment subject argona proving that it has reduced execration rove or not (Gorecki). The survey proved to be negative showing that the death penalization actuall(a)y had additiond crime rate rather than decreasing it (Gorecki). Professor Craig Haney of University of California at Santa Cruz conducted the survey on 800 citizens of Santa Cruz, they were chosen randomly by their social aegis numbers (Gorecki). Professor Haney conducted this same cordial of survey back in 1989 when he received strong favor of the death penalty (Gorecki).In 1989, 74% of 800 citizens favored the dea th penalty, and in 2009, those numbers cut out drastically to 44% (www. deathpenaltyinfo. com). The Supreme court of law causas Ballard v. Florida, Thibodeaux v. Louisiana are near of the spelly recent cases of bare execution that took stray in less than a hug drug (www. deathpenaltyinfo. com). There are many other reasons that I allow present posterior in this essay to prove that the death penalty is not a just way to punish a roughshod (Schabas). To abolish the death penalty, we should replace it with feel shackles without parole.Doing so will ransom us notes and maybe increase budgets for things that communities require, it could sustain the lives of irreproachables from dying, no more irreverence of the Eighth Amendment and human morals, and no leaven that it deters crime rate. First, loose people are getting executed ever since the death penalty has been most. The death penalty has claimed lives of 141 blameless citizens since 1973-today with little ove r half universe black and the other half are whites and other races (www. deathpenaltyinfo. com). The Innocence protection sham became a law in 2004 (Ross).Law had a huge consequence on innocent executions because the law forced the Supreme court of justice to test the deoxyribonucleic acid of an inmate and retard it with the sample found at the crime scene (Guernesey). Act too started charging money to the United States prisons for every wrong article of faith do since the effect of the law (Guernesey). Innocent convictions were also cause by racism, bribing, eyewitness error, snitch, giving medication misconduct, and false confessions. To stop innocent executions we should call down to the courts to allow two different attorneys to agree a look in at the same case for errors that could have been baffled by one.Judges should not go straight on conclusion, but ask if anyone on both sides have a linger doubt they might want to clear, and Secondly, the death penalty co st up to $117 trillion for up to four executions per year (Costanzo). Estimated cost for following an inmate in a cell until the execution date fair approximately $90,000 $95,000 (Costanzo). State of California itself has held 1940 executions since 1978 up until 2009 estimated total cost for 1940 execution was around $4 billion (www. deathpenaltyinfo. com). In compare to the death penalty cases, action custody cases cost 4 times less (Costanzo).The United States can save up to $12 trillion per year if the death penalty gets replaced by animateness bondage without parole (Costanzo). The American Civil Liberties sum total reviewed the statistics on taxpayers money and concluded that, roughly $90 million goes towards the death penalty executions (Costanzo). Capital trails costs up to $11 million per execution comparing to $4 million for life imprisonment (www. deathpenaltyinfo. com). intimately everyone in the United States, whether theyre against the death penalty or no t, complains about current checker of the US economy not creation very good.Due to that fact, we should replace the death penalty with life imprisonment this could save money for infrastructures, schools, colleges and health care and increase their one-year budgets. Biases also play a long role in determining who will and who will not get executed (Ross). Types of biases that Im referring to are racial bias and phratry bias, and political bias (Ross). According to NAACP (National railroad tie of the Advancement of Colored People), out of 40 percent of inmates on death row, 12 percent accused inmates are penalized collectable to the racial bias in their case (Winters147).Another study was conducted by NAACP, informing us that killers of whites are more likely to get executed than the killers of black (Ross). To avoid racial bias effecting capital punishment decisions, U. S. Senate suggested a Racial justice Act, an act that interdict any case that was suspected and held und er racial discrimination, but it was consistently overcome (Bohm). Class biases are much more common than racial bias, class biases occurs when a lower class person gets accused and doesnt have enough wealth to take on a good defense lawyer (Haag 167).Protagonist side would palisade that the death penalty cause deterrence in crime judge, DNA Testing saved many innocent victims, even bible back up the death penalty, Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own mental image (Genesis 96) and life imprisonment keep the fear alive inside victims family. The American Civil Liberties Union collected some data on crime grade over the other(prenominal) few years and concluded that, the pro death penalty states had higher crime by up to 46 percent than the states without the death penalty (www. aclu. org).Statistics showed that, Eventhough, crime rates in the pro death penalty states has decreased, crime rates in states without the death penalty had also decreased. In 2011, 11,221 people were killed in thirty-four pro death penalty states, whereas precisely 6,395 people were killed in sixteen anti-death penalty states (www. deathpenaltyinfo. com). DNA testing was first used in 1990s, but massive effect of that system took place in the phratry 2011 when it saved 273 lives of innocents that were once announced bloodguilty (www. aclu. org). DNA system saved 75 percent of innocent convictions in past few years, but what about take a breath 25 percent (www. clu. org)? Now this could be where the class biases come in, rich people could force to not have DNA testing conducted with the power of their money, or abject people could not afford a tests like these once they started paying lawyer fees (www. aclu. org). Pro-death penalty people would also argue that if the death penalty is replaced with life imprisonment without parole, it would keep the fear of criminal being alive inside them. But theorise about other side effects the death penalty is having on the society, the death penalty is doing nothing but executing.As mentioned early in the essay, the death penalty does not deter crime rate, it kills innocent people, and it costs 4 times more than life imprisonment (Costanzo). The life imprisonment could save lives of many innocent people who would have been executed by the death penalty. hardly what people are worried about are inmates escaping the prisons, but there are low medical prognosiss of escaping, because according to the Bureau of thatice Department, in 2006, inmates escape rate was 3 percent for every 2 million inmates (www. bjs. ov). In 2011, numbers are around 1. 3 percent per 2 million inmates (www. bjs. gov). I am sure that if everyone knew all facts related to the death penalty, they would have never stood by it and it is not late to be so yet. By looking at the both sides carefully and patiently, I see we should replace death penalty with life imprisonment, because deat h penalty has many mischievous effects like high costs, innocent executions, different types of biases effecting final judgment, violation of the one-eighth amendment and human morals.Whereas, life imprisonment 4 times less than the death penalty, and innocent people have a chance to be free if they are turn up not guilty. It is not our job to take revenge on people, listen to the name of creator, Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for Gods wrath, for it is written It is mine to penalise I will repay. cause Cited Bohm, Robert M. Ultimate Sanction Understanding the end Penalty through Its legion(predicate) Voices and Many Sides. New York Kaplan Pub. , 2010. Print. 13 Feb. 2013Costanzo, Mark Just revenge costs and consequences of the death penalty St. Martins Press, New York, schoolman await Complete, 1997. Print. 18 January 2013. Gorecki, Jan. Capital Punishment Crimial Law and social Evolution. New York Columbia UP, pedantic Search Complete, 2000. Print. 22 J anuary 2013. Guernsey, JoAnn Bren. The stopping point Penalty middling Solution or Moral misery? Minneapolis Twenty-First Century, 2010. Print. 22 February 2013. Schabas, William. The Abolition of the demise Penalty in International Law. Cambridge, U. K. Cambridge UP, Academic Search Complte 1997. Print. 11 February 2013. Winters, Paul A. The Death Penalty Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego, CA Greenhaven, Academic Search Complete 1997. Print. 20 February 2013. United States. Bureau Of Justice. US Department of Justice. Prisoners in 2011. By Ann E. Carson and William J. Sabol. N. p. , Dec. 2012. Web. 9 Apr. 2013. Cooper, David. Deterrence States Without the Death Penalty Have Had Consistently trim down Murder Rates. Death Penalty cultivation Center. N. p. , n. d. Web. 12 Apr. 2013. <http//www. deathpenaltyinfo. org >.